pressug.com News 24 7
Related Articles
By Alexander Luyima | The Hoima Post | Kampala — 28 October 2025
Ugandans are increasingly disillusioned with the Electoral Commission (EC), as recent events suggest that the institution’s independence is being compromised. Allegations of bias, manipulation, and unlawful conduct have surfaced, casting doubt on the credibility of the upcoming 2026 general elections.
Ongoing Court Cases Involving EC Chairperson
Justice Simon Byabakama, the current EC Chairperson, is embroiled in legal proceedings questioning the legality of his appointment. A criminal case is underway at the High Court, alleging that Byabakama assumed the position without properly resigning from his previous judicial role. This matter, which resumed on 8 August 2025, raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the EC’s leadership.
> “The law is clear: a judge cannot assume the role of EC Chairperson without first vacating their judicial office. This is the subject of ongoing legal scrutiny,” says legal analyst Dr. Anthony Laker.
The outcome of this case is critical, as it could determine whether decisions taken by the Commission under Byabakama’s leadership are lawful and binding.
Allegations of State House Influence
Concerns have grown over the reported influence of State House on EC activities. Observers and political analysts argue that executive pressure may compromise the Commission’s neutrality, particularly in the handling of nomination and procurement processes.
Reports indicate that State House officials have been involved in the procurement of biometric systems and election technology — functions that should fall squarely under the independent authority of the EC.
> “When the executive branch exerts control over election systems and processes, it undermines public trust and erodes the independence of the Commission,” notes political commentator Brendah Nakato.
Blocked Opposition Candidates: A Pattern of Suppression
Several opposition candidates, particularly from the National Unity Platform (NUP), have reported being obstructed during the nomination process.
Bukedea District – Speaker Anita Annet Among
Opposition aspirants in Bukedea claim they were denied access to the nomination centre while Speaker Among was declared unopposed. Journalists were also barred, and internet disruptions were reported at the venue.
> “Several of our candidates were blocked from accessing nomination venues. This has happened before, and it is happening again,” said NUP Secretary-General David Lewis Rubongoya.
Ruhinda North, Mitooma District – Deputy Speaker Thomas Tayebwa
NUP aspirant Osbert Kato alleges that he arrived on his nomination day with all required documents, only to be delayed and invalidated by officials. Meanwhile, Deputy Speaker Tayebwa was processed and declared unopposed.
Retired General David Sejusa described these actions as:
> “A toxic culture of fear and manipulation. Why would any politician celebrate being unopposed when opponents were pushed aside? It is an insult to democracy.”
These cases illustrate a troubling trend in which opposition candidates face systematic barriers, undermining the principle of fair contestation.
Public Outcry and Calls for Reform
The combination of ongoing legal challenges against Byabakama and allegations of State House interference has triggered public concern. Citizens and civil society organizations are demanding immediate reforms to ensure the EC operates independently and transparently.
> “An election without real contestation is not an election. It is pre-arranged theatre,” said Benson Ekwe, Executive Director of the Public Affairs Centre.
The public is calling for:
1. Full transparency in nomination processes, including logs showing who entered and who was denied access.
2. Accountability for any internet or communication disruptions at nomination centres.
3. Independent audits and observer participation in all election-related procedures.
4. Swift judicial resolution of complaints to prevent pre-election manipulation.
Conclusion
The credibility of Uganda’s 2026 elections hangs in the balance. The ongoing court case involving EC Chairperson Byabakama and the reported influence of State House on electoral activities threaten to erode public trust and democratic integrity.
Ugandans deserve an electoral system that is fair, transparent, and independent. Until the EC demonstrates its impartiality, citizens will continue to question whether their voices truly matter in shaping the country’s future.
